Family Tree Magazine (not a magazine I have written for in the past) wants to highlight the Top 40 Genealogy Blogs in their May 2010 issue. In addition to many of the blogs I read daily written by many people who have become good friends, What’s Past is Prologue has been included among the nominees! You can find it in the Personal/Family category. Other categories include All-around, Local/Regional, Cemetery, Photos/Heirlooms, Heritage, News/Resources, How-to, Genealogy Companies, and Genetic Genealogy. Footnotemaven (also a nominee) has a list with links to each and every nominee in this post. Thanks to those who nominated my blog, and thanks in advance for your votes! The voting period is open until November 5th.
Archive for the ‘Miscellaneous’ Category
October is Polish-American Heritage Month! The Polish American Center describes this event as “a national celebration of Polish history, culture and pride.” Even if you don’t have any Polish ancestry, it’s a great time to learn more about Polish history and culture. Last year What’s Past is Prologue hosted a month-long Polish History and Culture Challenge – all contributions can be found in this post. I’m not quite as organized this year, but I want to offer some tips on celebrating your Polish heritage with the Top Ways to Celebrate Polish-American Heritage Month:
If you have Polish Ancestry…
- Locate an immigrant ancestor’s place of origin ~ Ancestry magazine has a great guide to help here.
- Find a church record for one of your ancestors ~ here are some translation aids to help once you find it.
- Find and translate the Słownik Geograficzny entry for your ancestor’s hometown ~ here’s a guide to assist.
- Learn the origin and meaning of one of your Polish surnames ~ read my interview with author Fred Hoffman, and then run out to buy his books on Polish surnames!
- Join a Polish genealogical society ~ such as the Polish Genealogical Society of America.
And even if you’re not Polish…
- Read a book by a Polish author ~ Many are available in English translations. Are you a science fiction fan? Try Stanisław Lem. Enjoy non-fiction? Try Ryszard Kapuściński. In the mood for sweeping romantic historical epics? Definitely try Henryk Sienkiewicz.
- Learn about an event in Polish history ~ Several important anniversaries occurred or will occur in 2009, such as the 230th anniversary of the death of General Casimir Pulaski (father of the American Cavalry) and the 70th anniversary of the invasion of Poland and the outbreak of World War II.
- Watch a Polish movie ~ Try Three Colours (Polish: Trzy kolory), the collective title of the trilogy directed by Krzysztof Kieślowski, Agnieszka Holland’s Europa, Europa, or Katyń, directed by Andrzej Wajda.
- Make a recipe for some Polish food ~ who wouldn’t want some pierogi? Did you hear about the Polish nun who has become a best-selling cookbook author?
- Learn how to polka! ~ Sheri gave us a good intro to the polka for my Polish History and Culture Challenge!
Kiss Us, We’re Polish (and Proud…)!
As always, I encourage my readers to also check out some great blogs of my fellow Polish-American genea-bloggers:
Steve’s Genealogy Blog ~ read about Steve’s visit to Poland, or see samples of expert translation of vital records!
Creative Gene ~ Jasia writes about “genealogy and more” including her Polish heritage, Detroit Polonia, and Polish crafts!
Al’s Polish-American Genealogy Research ~ Al’s blog gives you exactly what’s in the title of his blog – solid genealogy research that serves as an example to us all!
If you have a blog about Polish genealogy, history, heritage, or culture, tell us about it in the comments!
(Polish Pride image from the Polish Heritage Gift Shop – buy your favorite Pole an expression of pride today!)
It’s time for my monthly “Weekend with Shades” column at Shades of the Departed, The Humor of It. This month read all about my obsessive search for photos of my ancestors and my hopefully humorous musings on what to do if you don’t have any in “Will the Real Pointkowski Great-Grandparents Please Stand Up?”
I’d choose the nice Polish fellow sporting shades pictured here to be my ancestor, but if he was my ancestor he wouldn’t have been pope!
Previous “Weekend with Shades” columns:
- March – Off with Their Heads
- April – There’s Always One
- May – Rites and Wrongs of Passage
- June – Vacation Lampoonery
- July – Fotomat: What’s That?
- August – A Developing Genealogist
The Social Security Death Index, called the SSDI, is a wonderful took for genealogists. The SSDI is available for free on various sites, including Ancestry.com and Genealogy Bank. Steve Morse even has a one-step search tool for it. The SSDI is useful because it provides the birth and death date for individuals that applied for a social security card. More importantly, if you request a copy of the person’s actual application, called the SS-5, you may find out the parents’ names as well as where the person worked at that time. If the person was an immigrant, they often state their full birthplace including the town (but many times just put the country of birth).
Some beginning researchers give up too soon – if they don’t find the name in the index, they assume that that individual never applied for social security. That is not always the case – the index was compiled around 1962, and many earlier deaths were not included.
I have several ancestors who actually applied for social security but were not listed in the SSDI. Both died prior to the 1962 cutoff for indexing:
- Joseph Zawodny, 1880 – 1944, applied 04/01/1938
- Louis Pater, 1893 – 1957, unknown date of application
Did you know that the name in the SSDI can be spelling incorrectly? Both of my grandparents are listed as POINTKOWSKI in the SSDI. I have a copy of my grandfather’s SS-5 from November, 1936 – one year after President Roosevelt began the Social Security program. On the application, he quite clearly spells his name as POINTKOUSKI. I guess he never bothered to correct them once they started sending him checks! It’s a good thing they didn’t ask for much in 1936 in the form of documentation. If he had to produce his birth certificate, he would have had a difficult time explaining why it lists his last name as KINCOSKI. His parents’ actual surname was PIONTKOWSKI, but neither seems to have applied for social security prior to their deaths in 1937 and 1942.
Some researchers get frustrated when they can’t find their ancestors in the SSDI. However, when it first came about it did not include several categories of workers including state or city employees or those that were self-employed. This explains why two of my grandmother’s brothers are nowhere to be found – one was a fireman, and one ran his own business. Also, if for some reason a person’s death was not reported to the Social Security Administration, it will not be listed in the SSDI.
Read more about the SSDI at Joe Beine’s Death Indexes site – The Social Security Death Index
It’s time for my monthly Weekend with Shades column at Shades of the Departed, The Humor of It. This month read all about a developing genealogist…me! I didn’t realize it back then, but working behind a photo developing counter in college taught me skills that later became useful as a genealogist. It wasn’t funny at the time, but hopefully it is now! Do you remember when you used film in your camera and it had to be developed into prints? Did you ever pick up your photos and they were not your photos? Hey, don’t blame me, I just worked there. Read all about it at A Developing Genealogist.
UPDATE: More info has been found…see my October 25th post, A Sweeter “Sweet Sixteen”
Whether we know their names or not, we all have sixteen great-great grandparents. Randy Seaver’s latest edition of Saturday Night Genealogical Fun has challenged us to list them all with their birth and death dates and locations, as well as figure out our nationality percentages as a result. While I did some rough math last night and commented back to Randy on Facebook, I decided to put this into a blog post today. For one, it readily shows something I already knew – while certain “branches” on my family tree are quite full and sprout quite high – back ten generations from me at its highest point – the sad fact is that part of my family tree remains a bare twig. As a genealogist, I hate that! As you will see below, it’s the far left part of my tree – my patrilineal line. Some might even argue that’s the most important, at least for the Y-DNA line of my brother and his sons. Another fun part of this exercise was to see all of the surnames I have uncovered so far. Here are my sixteen great-great grandparents:
1. Unknown PIONTKOWSKI, father of Jan Bołesław Piontkowski. Birth and death unknown, presumably from Warsaw, Poland where Jan was born. Nationality: Polish
2. Unknown wife of #1, mother of Jan Bołesław Piontkowski. Birth and death unknown, presumably from Warsaw, Poland where Jan was born. Nationality: Polish
3. Leopold KIESWETTER, father of Róza Kieswetter. Birth and death unknown. Presumed nationality: Polish
4. Unknown wife of #3, mother of Róza Kieswetter. Birth and death unknown. Presumed nationality: Polish
5. Josef BERGMEISTER, father of Josef Bergmeister. Born 09 February 1843 in Puch, Bavaria, son of Jakob Bergmeister and Anna Maria Daniel. Died before 1884, unknown place. Nationality: German (Bavarian)
6. Ursula DALLMEIER, mother of Josef Bergmeister. Born 17 March 1847 in Aichach, Bavaria, daughter of Joseph Dallmeier and Ursula Eulinger. Died between 1897 and 1919, presumably in Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany. Nationality: German (Bavarian)
7. Karl ECHERER, father of Maria Echerer. Born 31 May 1846 in Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm, Bavaria, son of Ignaz Echerer and Magdalena Nigg. Died after 1882 in Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm, Bavaria. Nationality: German (Bavarian)
8. Margarethe FISCHER, mother of Maria Echerer. Born 21 January 1845 in Langenbruck, Bavaria, daughter of Franz Xaver Fischer and Barbara Gürtner. Died 04 October 1895 in Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm, Bavaria, Germany. Nationality: German (Bavarian)
9. Jozef PATER, father of Ludwig Pater. Born on 21 September 1864 in Ruda Guzowska, Poland, son of Jan Pater and Teofilia Zakrzewska. Died on 11 August 1945 in Philadelphia, PA, USA. Nationality: Polish
10. Antonina Rozalia PLUTA, mother of Ludwig Pater. Born on 21 June 1863 in Mszczonów, Poland, daughter of Ludwik Pluta and Franciszka Anna Wojciechowska. Died on 12 December 1938 in Philadelphia, PA, USA. Nationality: Polish
11. Jan MÜLLER, father of Elżbieta Müller. Birth and death unknown. Presumed nationality: Bohemian
12. Elizabeth SMETANA, mother of Elżbieta Müller. Birth and death unknown. Presumed nationality: Bohemian
13. Wawrzyniec ZAWODNY, father of Jozef Zawodny. Born around 1853 in unknown location to Szymon Zawodny and Katarzyna Ratajewska. Died 13 December 1917 in Dobrosołowo, Poland. Nationality: Polish
14. Katarzyna MARIANSKA, mother of Jozef Zawodny. Born around 1853, presumably in Komorowo, Poland, to Stanisław Marianski and Marianna Radomska. Died 29 July 1923 in Dobrosołowo, Poland. Nationality: Polish
15. Wincenty SLESINSKI, father of Wacława Slesinska. Born around 1851, presumably in Wilczyn, Poland, to Jozef Slesinski and Elżbieta Michalowska. Died 01 January 1919 in Dobrosołowo, Poland. Nationality: Polish
16. Stanisława DROGOWSKA, mother of Wacława Slesinski. Born around 1860, presumably in Wilczyn, Poland, to Jan Drogowski and Konstancja Kubicka. Died 30 December 1918 in Dobrosołowo, Poland. Nationality: Polish
Of 16 great-great grandparents, 13 can be named. As for the facts, I have definite birth and death dates for only 3, definite birth and unknown death dates for 3, unknown birth and definite death dates for 4, and all dates unknown for 6. Do you know what that means? It means I have a lot of genealogical research to do! In the early days of my research, I got so excited at the ability to go back and back and back on certain lines that I forgot about following up the more “recent” folks with all of the necessary and pertinent data.
Nationality-wise, this makes me:
- 62.5% Polish – 10 great-greats (6 definite, 4 assumed to be Polish)
- 25% German – 4 great-greats
- 12.5% Bohemian – 2 great-greats that are presumed Bohemian based on info I have so far
I have identified strongly with my Bavarian roots, yet it only comprises 25% of my genes. Perhaps that identification comes from the fact that this side was so much easier to search so far!
Some random facts about my sweet sixteen –
- #9 and 10 are my only 2nd great grandparents to immigrate to the United States, making my paternal grandfather the only grandparent to know his own grandparents.
- #15 and 16 died two days apart from each other
- I have photographs of none of my sixteen 2nd great grandparents and I have photographs of only six of their children, my great-grandparents.
- My maternal grandmother’s grandparents all died between 1917 and 1923, long after their children came to the U.S. They lived close to the border of German-occupied Poland and Russian-occupied Poland, but I do not yet know if their deaths were related to World War I. My grandmother never met her grandparents, but had they also immigrated she would have known them since she was born in 1907.
Thanks for more genealogical fun, Randy! It is embarrassing that my tree is a bit barren in spots, but I’m glad I can name as many and I can. Many people today can not name their 8 great-grandparents…yet they don’t seem bothered by it at all. Ask a genealogist to name their 16 great-greats, and now you’ve got some angry folks who realize they have to work harder!
Sometimes we need a little humor in our blogging – especially after reading the latest edition of the COG and learning that all of us were this close to having our ancestry wiped out before we could even be born. I haven’t written a strictly humorous post in a while with the exception of my monthly guest appearances at Shades of the Departed. But it’s easy to find humor in the sheer act of blogging. We’ve seen a number of talented genea-bloggers take a break from their genealogical articles to write about the hysterical nature of those words we have to use for comment verification on each other’s blogs. But today I’d like to share one thing about this blog that has made me laugh recently, and it involves my “statistics”.
I’ve used Google Analytics on other blogs, and I love the features that allow you to find out everything about your visitors. I mean everything – where they are from, how long they visited, what they looked at, and if they washed their hands before they left. Well, maybe not that last one, but I bet those folks at Google are working on it. I was disappointed that I can’t use Analytics on What’s Past is Prologue – you see, I’m too cheap to host the blog myself, so I’m using the free version. And with the free version, Google Analytics is verboten. But WordPress does give us economical folks a version of it. Sort of. It would be like calling a gumdrop a version of an ice cream sundae. They are both desserts of sorts, but, ah, different!
One thing my cheapy free version of statistics gives me is the “search terms” that visitors are searching for when they unexpectedly land here. I’ve gotten many laughs in recent months over these terms, and I’ve also scratched my head in bewilderment. Wait, someone is searching for that? And the search engine points them to my blog? I’m not sure if I should be offended or grateful for the free traffic. “Hey, I can’t help you with that, but if you want to stay a while maybe I can interest you in something else…” Here are some of the best of the strange, odd, and downright scary search terms that have directed folks to What’s Past is Prologue – with my comments, of course. Note: These terms are all actual search terms as reported to me by WordPress! Let’s call it the 1st Edition of the Carnival of Strange Search Terms!
GENEALOGY RELATED…SORT OF
first communion photography tempest – The first 3 words I can understand – after all, I’ve shown many photos here including my father’s first communion. And we all know what play the title of this blog comes from. What I can’t fathom is what it means when you combine the terms together. That must have been quite the stormy event!
what is an aunt – Seriously? My 4-year-old niece already understands why I am called “Aunt Donna” and the lady across the street is not.
can’t find my marriage licenese – Note: It’s probably not here either.
piontkowski murder mystery – You’ve got my attention! Just when I thought my great-grandfather was mysterious enough, now I have to wonder if there’s a murder mystery to solve, too.
rust genealogy – Father: Iron, Mother: Oxygen, Baby Rust born under the sign of Aquarius.
William Shakespeare’s marriage photos – I had no idea photography went back that far!
shakespear prologue car – Apparently automobiles are older than I thought as well.
squinny shakespeare – I have no idea what it means, but I’d love the answer to this one myself.
carnival themed wedding – Really? Someone would actually do that?
wedding prosthesis – I don’t think I want to know. Should this be in the “Kinky” category below?
stories of fraud marriage(2008-2009) – I sense a story here, and some slight hostility in the searcher.
plain girl pictures – Hey! I think I’m insulted.
ugliest ballet tutu – I know what page this would have brought them to, but I want to know why you’re searching for it!
ugly women faces – HEY! They must be mistaken, for this search term surely wouldn’t lead to the page with my photo on it!
impossible to pronounce polish name – Really, “Pointkouski” isn’t THAT hard.
what do houses of nj look like – Ours look like houses that the rest of the country lives in. Really.
what’s in my soul – If you found the answer here, please let me know so I can market it.
why can’t humans live past 200 years old – We can live to 200?
what.section.of.phila.do.irish.live – we.let.them.live.anywhere.they.want.
what to do after a blizzard hits – Shovel.
six months two weeks one day and an hour – Equals the amount of time it would take me to figure out how this would lead here.
JUST PLAIN ODD
show me beautifull teady beer photos – How about if I show you a dictionary instead?
list of monks at west thornton in1880 – And this led you here because…?
hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy tattoos – Don’t panic, but the answer’s not here.
2009 meteor showers camping ground phila – You’ve obviously never been to Philadelphia if you believe you can see meteor showers here. There’s so much light pollution, I don’t need any outside lights over here on the other side of the river – I can see just fine from the humid glow across the way.
kitten and cockatiel co-habiting – LOL – That should be a sitcom.
three flexible sisters from the 1920s – I can’t even imagine what the searcher was looking for. Well, I can imagine, but why would I want to?
2 ugly transvestites – That would be my description of my dad and his comedic buddy, but, excuse me, you’re not only looking for transvestites, but ugly ones?
naked paternal grandmother – Eeeeewwww! Specifically wrong on so many levels.
schoolboys at crossdressing – I’ll second that eeeewwww and raise you a pedophile alert.
Bavarian naked women – The searcher was sorely disappointed in whatever page they were led to!
So there you have it! The next edition of this search term carnival will include more bizarre, freakish, and unusual ways that bring me more traffic! If you’re a geneablogger, do you encounter these strange and unusual researchers? Tell me about your best search terms! Until next time, I remain the Queen of Ugly Teady Beer Shakespearean Transvestite Marriage Photos.
It’s that time again…time for my monthly Weekend with Shades column at Shades of the Departed, The Humor of It. This month’s topic – the Fotomat! If you don’t know what a Fotomat is, well, that means you’re younger than I am. Take a peek at how I try to describe it to my nieces in Fotomat – What’s That?
That guy in the photo is certainly old enough to remember the Fotomats – that’s my big brother in 1960 and the father of my nieces who don’t quite know what to make of the whole concept. [In retrospect, I should have used this photo for my Weekend with Shades debut, Off With Their Heads!]
It’s safe to say that most of my readers are genealogists. I came upon a question today that may be of great interest to genealogists – what would you do if you couldn’t do genealogy? I don’t mean you can’t find someone or have a “brick wall” that is hindering your research. I mean what if you had all of the desire, curiosity, and sheer determination that we genealogists have to dig up our roots, but you could not research your family history because you didn’t know who your parents were? And the government won’t show you your own birth certificate?
I learned today that this is the fate of most adoptees in the United States. Birth records in 44 states are completely closed to adoptees, so they are unable to learn the bare facts about their family history. Privacy laws have been on the books for a few generations that deny access to adult adoptees to protect the privacy of the parents who chose to give their child up for adoption. In theory, it’s understandable. But in reality, is it practical? Advocates of open access insist the issue is unrelated to the decision to find or know their birth parents, but is more about a right that nearly all of us have to simply have a copy of the birth record that all other Americans are allowed to have. Those for open access argue that the family history, regardless of the reasons for the adoption, is important for health or genealogical reasons. Opponents insist that the parents have the right to remain unknown.
I think adoption is a wonderful thing and a selfless act on the part of both parties – the birth mother/parents as well as the adoptive parent/s. But does giving up a child to another out of love allow someone to remain anonymous? Does knowing your parents’ names guarantee a relationship with them?
It’s a tough issue, and I’m no expert since I am not adopted nor have I given up a child for adoption. But, as a genealogist, I honestly can’t imagine not knowing my ancestry. I know many people who have no interest in their genealogy whatsoever. But, what if you are like me and you do have that interest – yet you can’t even get a copy of your own birth certificate to surmise what nationality your ancestors were?
I learned about this issue because advocates of adoptee rights protested yesterday here at the Philadelphia Convention Center during the National Conference of State Legislatures. Read more about their cause here. I wish them luck. I don’t know what I’d do if I enjoyed genealogical research as much as I do but could not research my own genealogy. What would you do?
I’ve title this post “This and That” because it isn’t strictly a “Donna’s Picks” that highlights various other posts, but more of a little of “go see this” and my “comments on that”. Technically this should have been my second “Friday Five” post, in which I highlight five short things that aren’t extensive enough for a post of their own, but I am running a bit behind this week.
Rest in peace? First, many genea-bloggers have commented on a serious issue in Alabama first highlighted by Deep Fried Kudzu this past Friday. In Oxford, Alabama, developers are well on their way to destroying a 1,500 year old Native American mound to make way for a new Sam’s Club (like we all need another). We don’t know if this mound was a burial site or used for some other purposes, but the fact is that it is historical. I found it odd that even if they find remains buried there, it may not be enough to stop its destruction! Equally disturbing was news from Chicago of individuals uprooting graves to re-sell them! Aside from being completely disrespectful, I find practices like this to be immoral. To me, we all have a moral obligation to respect the dignity of human life in all forms – including the final resting places of those that have gone before us on earth. Besides, even if you lack respect for the dead, haven’t these people seen the Poltergeist films? Scared my silly as a teenager and affirmed the value of respecting the dead! What can we do? Get the word out about the building project in Alabama, and work hard to protect our local cemeteries.
Then and Now! For a while I’ve been thinking about shooting some “now” photos of either places in old photographs or of people in the same poses and places. I was planning on a photographic “then and now” series, but The Genealogue highlighted a site this week that did this to perfection in film! Visit Elliott’s home movie reconstructions to see his handywork. I especially love his “Dad Reconstruction” and “Mom Reconstruction” in which he filmed his parents doing things they did in the original home movies. Brilliant!
Irène Némirovsky – If you don’t know who this woman is, I encourage you to check out this piece on the “Woman of Letters” Exhibit at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in New York City. I first learned of Irene’s story through the publication of Suite Française. If she could write such a beautiful work in such circumstances, then I can only imagine the great works that were lost as a result of her death in a Nazi concentration camp. The survival of the manuscript itself is a fascinating story as well. The exhibit runs through 30 August, so if you are in New York City this summer be sure to take a look. The museum set up this site about Irene, her life and death, and her amazing works.
Genealogy Wise – I followed the crowd and joined GenealogyWise, the new “social network” for genealogists. My profile is here. While I like the concept, I still don’t quite see the point. While there are many more groups to join than on Facebook, it appears that most users are not starting new discussions in these groups, but leaving comments that amount to vague information about their surnames. Don’t we already have a multitude of surname boards that serve the same purpose? I’ll give it time – the site has not even officially debuted yet! But, take note of one thing I have discovered so far. On Facebook, I entered all of my surnames within my profile, so if you search for one of those names you’ll get me as well as people with that surname. On GenealogyWise, a basic search for a name only gives you users that bear that name – to search all of the surnames that people entered in their profile, you have to do an “Advanced Search”.
Laugh of the Week – when I sent a cousin some research on her branch of the family, her response was, “So, are you finished your genealogy now?” [insert long pause for raucous laughter from all of my fellow genealogists]
Stay Tuned – Coming Soon at What’s Past is Prologue – Some things I am working on include an entry for the 76th edition of the Carnival of Genealogy on summer vacation memories and another postcard for the 3rd Festival of Postcards on signs. My vacation story is a doozy, and I am still debating which of two postcards to illustrate signs – the more personal story, or a photo of a much bigger sign? Also, for the last few months I have been working on a post about my Miller ancestors and relatives. Every time I am about to post the series, I seem to find more information. Not that it’s a bad thing, but it keeps delaying it. I am actually quite tired of the Miller family by this point, so I hope to post “The Millers’ Tale” in the next two weeks! Thanks for reading…
Posts have been irregular of late, so welcome to my “Friday Five” – five short thoughts, tips, links, or comments that either aren’t lengthy enough to form a whole post or they actually have nothing to do with genealogy!
1 – The case of John Barnes and Stephen Damman
I was surprised that this piece of news wasn’t picked up by more genea-blogs. John Barnes is convinced that he is not really a member of his family. After too many unanswered questions about his birth, he began to research missing children. After learning of the case of Stephen Damman, a toddler kidnapped outside of a New York bakery in 1955, he wondered if he was the missing boy. Remarkably, the adult Barnes resembled the photo of the toddler – most notably his eyes and a similar facial scar. Damman’s sister, who was a baby at the time of the kidnapping, met with Barnes and noted a resemblance to her father. A “do it yourself” DNA test indicated the possibility that they were related. The FBI got involved to perform a more detailed DNA test to determine if Barnes was indeed the boy who had been missing for over 50 years. Sadly, at least for Barnes and the Damman family, the DNA test showed that he is not. Barnes’ own father is still alive and incredulous that his son thinks he was either adopted, switched at birth, or kidnapped. What struck me about this story is the fact that at one time or another, most of us have wondered if we’re related to our own parents and siblings. “Surely I was adopted! I am nothing like him/her/them!” But just about all of us that were not adopted have to admit that, whether because of shared physical traits or personality traits, we are our parents’ child. How sad it must be for Mr. Barnes to feel so disconnected from the family he grew up with that he believes he does not really share their blood. Perhaps he does not – I have not read any mention of a DNA test to prove his relation to his own father. But it is also sad for the elderly Mr. Damman, who had a glimmer of hope after years of missing his son, and also for his daughter who hoped to to know her brother. She and Barnes both said they felt a “connection”, which made the finding even sadder. This was an interesting genealogical mystery involving DNA testing, but it did not have the happy ending that everyone wanted.
2 – The Empire that was Russia
On Facebook, Thomas MacEntee posted a link to the amazing photographs of Sergei Prokudin-Gorskii, the photographer to the czar in 1905. He developed (no pun intended) a way to take color photographs using three colored filters. When the images are combined, it results in a color photograph. I knew our ancestors didn’t live in a black and white world like most photographs show us, but seeing these vibrant photographs of old scenes is amazing. See the photos at the Library of Congress Exhibit. Although I cherish even the few black and white photos I have of my ancestors, wouldn’t it be amazing to see them in color?
3 – Wireless Printers and Scanners
I’m shopping for a wireless printer-scanner. Does anyone have any recommendations?
4 – Local Historians
My local historical society found my local history article from the COG in May, so this week I’ll attend a meeting and likely join their group.
5 – Laugh of the Week
That’s all, folks. Have a happy 4th of July and enjoy the 3-day weekend if you are lucky enough to have one!
While footnoteMaven is off to California for the Southern California Genealogy Jamboree, I’m blog-sitting today over at Shades of the Departed with my monthly “Weekend with Shades” column, The Humor of It. In keeping with the season, today’s article is “Vacation Lampoonery” with some tips on taking photographs that help you remember the humorous side of your summer vacations!
I just spent more time than I want to admit working on Bill West’s Genea-bloggers’ Just Make Up Some Lyrics Challenge! I’m used to making up lyrics to songs on the radio – yes, people think I’m strange. So I was lucky that Bill had such an excellent idea. I’m still strange, but now I have company! Oddly enough, I had seen the original post of the challenge as well as some of the great contributions so far. I even commented on footnoteMaven’s post today that I had better post mine before someone “steals” my song. Imagine my surprise when I saw Bill’s response to his own challenge. It was posted almost two weeks ago, but I somehow missed it. Ooops! It seems as though Bill is singing MY song! But our surnames are different, and so are our rhymes, so I am going to post my lyrics anyway. Great minds think alike, so I’m sure Bill won’t mind (I could use a flutaphone accompaniment though). I knew I should have chosen “Disturbia” or “Superfreak” or something more original…oh well, there is still time to submit another song to the challenge!
My Favorite Finds (to the tune of “My Favorite Things” from The Sound of Music)
Piontkowski grandfather, changing his name,
Finding his arrival was just like a game,
Finally found it, nearly losing my mind.
One more example of a wonderful find!
I can’t find them!
What’s the spelling?
Handwriting’s really bad!
I simply remember my favorite finds,
And then I don’t feel so mad.
[Submitted for the first-ever Just Make Up the Lyrics Challenge: Family Names – see the rules here.]
It’s that time again…time for my monthly Weekend with Shades column, The Humor of It, at Shades of the Departed. After being sick this month, I had a hard time finding the humor in anything, but I found some inspiration in events that happen around this time of year – and seeing how silly my old photos of those events looked certainly helped! This month’s column is called Rites & Wrongs of Passage. It tries to find the humor in those two events that were oh-so-important long ago – the prom and graduation. Once again, I have a special photo (two for one this month) to invite you to join me at Weekend with Shades.
Yes, I know footnoteMaven doesn’t refer to these sorts of shades, but I can’t resist. Besides, I want to see how many shades photographs I can find – it’s my own personal photo carnival each month to entice you to wander over to Shades of the Departed for my column. Come to think of it, you should also wander over every weekend because there is a stellar collection of columnists, as well as during the week for the illustrious footnoteMaven’s own writing.
Well, I’m back from my trip to San Diego! But it seems I’m on my way again, at least virtually… Join me at Shades of the Departed for my Weekend with Shades monthly column, The Humor of It. This month’s post is entitled There’s Always One:
When it comes to taking a group photo, there always seems to be one – one person who completely, unequivocally messes up the shot.
Read the rest over at footnoteMaven’s place – I’ll see you there…I’m the one with my shades on.
I rarely have time to even read Randy’s Saturday Night Fun Challenges on a Saturday night, much less respond to them. But tonight, I do have some time, and this one is not so challenging for me to answer! If Randy had chosen any other line, it would have been harder.
The challenge is this: Provide a list of your paternal grandmother’s patrilineal line. Answer these questions:
* What was your father’s mother’s maiden name?
* What was your father’s mother’s father’s name?
* What is your father’s mother’s father’s patrilineal line? That is, his father’s father’s father’s … back to the most distant male ancestor in that line?
* Can you identify male sibling(s) of your father’s mother, and any living male descendants from those male sibling(s)? If so, you have a candidate to do a Y-DNA test on that patrilineal line. If not, you may have to find male siblings, and their descendants, of the next generation back, or even further.
Here are my responses:
My father’s mother was Margaret Bergmeister (1913-1998), born in Philadelphia, PA.
- My father’s mother’s father’s name was Joseph Bergmeister (1873-1927), born in Vohburg a.d. Donau, Bavaria, Germany.
- His father was also named Joseph Bergmeister (1843-unknown before 1885), born in Puch, Bavaria, Germany.
- His father was Jakob Bergmeister (1805-1870), born in Puch, Bavaria, Germany.
- His father was Joseph Bergmeister (1763-1840), born in Puch, Bavaria, Germany.
- His father was Johann Paul Bergmeister (1721-1784), born in Puch, Bavaria, Germany.
- His father was Martin Bergmeister (ca 1689-1752), born in Puch, Bavaria, Germany.
- His father was likely Jakob Bergmeister / Permeister but this info is still being researched.
My grandmother Margaret Bergmeister had three brothers –
- Joseph Bergmeister (1902-1986), who had three sons: Joseph, Robert, and Carl. There are three males descended from Joseph and Robert, and Carl had no children.
- Max Bergmeister (1905-?) had no sons.
- Julius Bergmeister(1907-?) had no sons.
Even if I did not have three male second cousins with the Bergmeister surname (two of whom I have been in touch with so far) and therefore candidates for the Y-DNA of my grandmother’s patrilineal line, I am also in touch with fourth and fifth male cousins with the common ancestors of Jakob (b.1805) or Joseph (b.1763) shown above. I haven’t looked into any kind of DNA testing, especially for this line, because there are plenty of Bergmeister men – both in the genealogical records and in my email in-box! Thanks, Grandmom, for having an easy patrilineal line to research! Click on the Bergmeister Family tab above for more info on this line.
Today it was announced that actress Betsy Blair died on March 13 at the age of 85. Unless you are a fan of classic film and/or Gene Kelly in particular, you might not recognize her name. Her obituaries seem to highlight two main facts about her life: she was the first wife of Gene Kelly, and as an actress her most memorable role was her Oscar-nominated performance in 1955’s Marty with Ernest Borgnine. For me, the news of her death was more than just a headline because I had the opportunity to meet her on three different occasions.
In late 2001, I was contacted by Gene and Betsy’s daughter, Kerry, concerning a benefit showing of Singin’ in the Rain. My Gene Kelly web site, The Gene Scene (1994 – 2012), was about seven years old and had a large enough following to be of use in promoting the event. I asked Kerry a rather bold question: “I’m traveling to London in a few months…would your mother meet with me?” I knew Betsy resided in London with her second husband, filmmaker Karl Reisz. To my surprise, I received her phone number and the instruction to call her when I arrived. I did, and I was further surprised with an invitation to her home for tea. I wanted to meet her, but I didn’t expect such graciousness to a stranger.
Betsy Blair was always described in magazines or biographies as the plain “girl next door”. When she invited me into her home, she became the “grandma next door” and immediately made me feel welcome. As we chatted, I was a bit starstruck – here was a woman who, at the age of 18, was married to one of Hollywood’s hottest emerging stars and was the friend and hostess to many of the biggest film stars of the 1940’s and ’50’s. Did it seem surreal to you, I asked, to have Judy Garland, Phil Silvers, and Lena Horne sitting around your living room on a Saturday night? She smiled and paused, as if thinking of how to describe it. She finally shrugged and said, “It was all so normal – at the time, it was so new – I didn’t realize there was anything unusual about it!”
Betsy had the unique ability to immediately make me feel as if we had been friends for years. She became as interested in my life as I was in hers. I didn’t ask questions as if I was interviewing her; we merely conversed. She understood that I admired the man who had once not only been a Hollywood star, but also the love of her life, and it was almost as if our mutual (if different) love for Gene bonded us together for that brief time. We talked about many things over the course of an hour, including the old studio system for making movies, her current work, movies today, Gene’s widow, Stanley Donen, and Gene’s reputation as a perfectionist. She told me that while filming On the Town, Frank Sinatra didn’t really want to rehearse the dancing, so he’d joke and fool around. Gene and Stanley would pretend the cameras were rolling so they’d get some practice time in!
A few months after my trip, I was delighted to have the opportunity to meet her once again – this time with her daughter in Ann Arbor, Michigan for the benefit showing of Singin’ in the Rain. At a dinner before the showing, it was Betsy who sought me out and rushed across a crowded room to say hello as if I was an old friend. More of her “down to earth” personality emerged throughout the evening as she shared a smoke with fans outside the theater and answered questions from two young Gene fans. One rather young fan excitedly asked a rather personal question, “What was it like to kiss Gene Kelly?” She smiled in my direction and gave a rather eloquent answer to the child: “When you love someone, it’s very special to kiss them – no matter who they are. Gene and I were married and in love, so it was very special.”
In 2003, Betsy published her memoirs, The Memory of All That. She told me about it during my first visit with her – including that the title was not her first choice. Her favorite title was Lucky in Love but since the book wasn’t only about her love life, the editors “didn’t like it”. She said, “I’m not sure who’s really going to want to read it anyway – there’s no scandal in it!” I met her again at a book signing in New York City, and again it was like a family reunion.
Betsy’s modesty is apparent even in her name – she wasn’t Liz, a flashy star’s name, but plain and simple Betsy. She was born Elizabeth Boger in Cliffside, NJ. After taking dancing lessons for years, she went to New York City at the age of 16 to get a job as a dancer. She met Kelly when she auditioned for a show at Billy Rose’s Diamond Horseshoe. There she mistook him, the show’s choreographer, for the busboy; he hired her anyway. Gene was, at the age of 28, twelve years older than Betsy. She appreciated his sophistication, and he became smitten. Over the next two years, Gene advanced from choreographer to Broadway star to a Hollywood contract, and their relationship also grew. The couple married literally on their way to Hollywood. In 1942, their first and only child was born, Kerry.
In the late 1940’s, Betsy appeared in some films. But her most famous “role”, at least according to news reports, seems to be the accusation that she was a communist. It almost lost her the role in Marty, and she became blacklisted moreso for her support of others who were blacklisted rather than any involvement in communist activities herself. Gene and Betsy divorced in 1957, but she never had anything bad to say about him afterwards (nor did he about her). She later married Karel Reisz and continued to work in films in Europe.
This weekend, newspapers and film sites will remember Betsy Blair as Gene’s wife, Karel’s wife, Ernest’s co-star (despite other film appearances, that was her most lauded role), and more. What you may not read about is her unassuming and gracious nature, her intelligence, and her wit. I wish I could have known her better, or longer, but I am grateful that my life was able to brush hers briefly. Good-bye, Betsy – I’ll miss you! Requiescat in pace.
But what’s the question? Fans of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy will know that it’s the meaning of life, the universe and everything. But on Sunday, March 8th, 42 happens to be the next mile-marker on my own personal odometer. (Coincidentally, I just found out that March 8th was also the date that Hitchhiker’s radio broadcast premiere 31 years ago – oh, the cosmic implications!)
I plan on taking a birthday break from blogging by spending the weekend gazing at palm trees, so I came up with a different and unusual way for my friends to wish me a “Happy Birthday” greeting. After all, my friends are different and unusual. Since you all also have a wonderful sense of humor, I do hope you’ll join in by posting a comment about THE BEST TIME WE NEVER HAD. That’s right – your best fictional memory of our fun. For those of you that think I’ve lost my mind along with my youth, let me explain…
I’m borrowing this idea from another blog I read called Darwin Catholic. For the last few years, she has celebrated her birthday by asking for “completely made up and fictional” memories. And the results are pretty funny. Since my friends’ humor IQs tip the scales, I thought this would be a unique challenge. (I’m counting on Thomas, Joe S., Killa, Jasia, MO, and various members of the Bucs clan at a minimum!) Come on, give the old gal a laugh while I’m sipping pina coladas on the beach!
Janet Hovorka, the Chart Chick, had a link to her sister’s blog. Her sister talks about how great it is to use Facebook to meet up with old friends and plan a family reunion. Then she asks an intriguing question:
…wouldn’t a genealogical version of facebook, devoid of time and space, be intriguing? Locate family members, link generations, pictures, tidbits, get to know your long losts…. I’d love to “friend” my 3rd great-grandmother Magdalena Straubhaar Schwendiman and have a bit of wall-to-wall with her. And I’m sure I’d love the status reports from my great-grandfather Joseph Hatton Carpenter. He had some jolly songs and anecdotes and was somewhat of an English character. Hmmmmm…
You had to do it…here I am off from work on a snow day and feeling in a creative mood. Well, let me think…what would it be like to have my ancestors on Facebook? See my take on what it would be like if my ancestors were on Facebook (click on the image to see a larger view):
I can see it now…what groups would my grandparents join? Would my grandmother “friend” her sisters that did not get along? Would the feuding brothers be friends? Further back, would the German-speaking ancestors befriend the Polish-speaking ones because they share common descendants? Who would be addicted to bumper stickers, flair, and games? What would my great-grandparents be “fans” of?
The “what-if” possibilities are endless – and humorous! If we could communicate with our deceased ancestors, we’d not only have more Friends, but more people commenting on our status, photos, and friends. Hmm, maybe we all already have enough advice in our lives!